Reasonably Well: Fr. Edward B. Connolly's Blog

Being as well as can be expected in an unreasonable world. This blog identifies the unreasonable
and the humor to be found in it. After all, Heaven is our real home and our end goal.

Ask Fr. Connolly your questions about the Catholic Faith

When Does Life Begin, Senator Obama?

August 31, 2008 - St. Joseph Church Bulletin, Girardville, PA


THERE IS NO ONE SO BLIND AS THE ONE WHO REFUSES TO SEE

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was being interviewed by Tom Brokaw on 24 August 2008.

As part of the interview, Mr. Brokaw played a portion of a videotape of a conversation between Pastor Rick Warren and Senator Barack Obama.  This conversation took place on 16 August 2008.

Please read the following:

MR. BROKAW (addressing Speaker Pelosi):  There was a very well publicized and very effective interview by Pastor Rick Warren at the Saddleback Church in California of the two candidates recently.  And on the right — especially — response from Senator Obama to the question of when life begins has been getting a lot of attention.  We want to just share with you how that went, and then you can take a look at it and, and respond to it for us.

(Plays videotape from 16 Aug)

PASTOR WARREN:  At what point does a baby get human rights, in your view?

SEN. OBAMA:  Well, you know, I think that whether you're looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is, is above my pay grade.

MR. BROKAW:  Senator Obama saying the question of when life begins is above his pay grade, whether you're looking at it scientifically or theologically. If he were to come to you and say, "Help me out here, Madame Speaker.  When does life begin?" what would you tell him?

SPEAKER PELOSI:  I would say that as an ardent, practicing Catholic, this is an issue that I have studied for a long time.  And what I know is, over the centuries, the doctors of the church have not been able to make that definition.  And Senator--St. Augustine said at three months.  We don't know. The point is, is that it shouldn't have an impact on the woman's right to choose.  Roe v. Wade talks about very clear definitions of when the child--first trimester, certain considerations; second trimester; not so third trimester.  There's very clear distinctions.  This isn't about abortion on demand, it's about a careful, careful consideration of all factors and--to--that a woman has to make with her doctor and her god.  And so I don't think anybody can tell you when life begins, human life begins.  As I say, the Catholic Church for centuries has been discussing this, and there are those who've decided...

MR. BROKAW:  The Catholic Church at the moment feels very strongly that it...

SPEAKER PELOSI:  I understand that.

MR. BROKAW:  ...begins at the point of conception.

SPEAKER PELOSI:  I understand.  And this is like maybe 50 years or something like that.  So again, over the history of the church, this is an issue of controversy.  But it is, it is also true that God has given us, each of us, a free will and a responsibility to answer for our actions.  And we want abortions to be safe, rare, and reduce the number of abortions.  That's why we have this fight in Congress over contraception.  My Republican colleagues do not support contraception.  If you want to reduce the number of abortions, and we all do, we must--it would behoove you to support family planning and, and contraception, you would think.  But that is not the case.  So we have to take--you know, we have to handle this as respectfully--this is sacred ground. We have to handle it very respectfully and not politicize it, as it has been--and I'm not saying Rick Warren did, because I don't think he did, but others will try to.

MR. BROKAW:  Madame Speaker, thanks very much for being with us.

SPEAKER PELOSI:  It's my pleasure.  Thank you.

In regard to this, please note the following memos:

 

To:  The Honorable Barack Obama
From:  Fr. E. B. Connolly

Dear Senator:

The question Pastor Warren asked you was as follows:  “At what point does a baby get human rights?”  You responded by saying that the answer to such a question is “above my pay grade”.  That is mildly humorous, Senator, but I’m afraid we can’t let you off the hook.  A man of your intelligence, attainments and aspirations needs to do better than that.

The answer to the question is this:  A human being gets human rights as soon as he or she is human, which means as soon as he or she comes into existence.  A human being comes into existence in the fallopian tube of his or her mother.  A spermatozoon from the father human enters an ovum from the mother human and — bam! — you’ve got yourself a brand new human being.  But why am I explaining this to a United States Senator?  Maybe your Dad never took you aside for “the talk”?  Or maybe you fell asleep in Health class in 9th grade?  If so, please feel free to give me a call.  We’ll make an appointment and I’ll explain it all to you in greater detail.

Respectfully, etc.
EBC


To:  The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
From:  Fr. E. B. Connolly

Dear Madame Speaker:


I am disappointed in you.  You come from a nice Italian Catholic family in Baltimore.  I think you even went to parochial school for a while, didn’t you?  How could you possibly say what you said?  You said — and with a straight face — that the Catholic Church was confused about when life begins and that we only started to take a position on the matter “like maybe 50 years (ago) or something like that”.  That is the most incredible and outrageous twisting of the truth I have come across since the last time you opened your mouth.  Please repent, go to confession and make a public retraction.

I wish you a long life and a healthy one, but we all have to die sometime.  Even Speakers of the House have to die.  When you do, I would like you to wind up in Heaven.  I warn you that it is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit to spread lies about what the Church has and has not taught.

Respectfully, etc.
EBC

 

Excerpt from the Platform of the Democratic Party

August 31, 2008 - St. Joseph Church Bulletin, Girardville, PA


EXCERPT FROM THE PLATFORM

OF

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

 

 

The following statement (part of the platform) was officially accepted at the quadrennial Democratic National Convention held last week in Denver CO.

 

"The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to choose a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right. The Democratic Party also strongly supports access to affordable family planning services and comprehensive age-appropriate sex education which empowers people to make informed choices and live healthy lives. We also recognize that such health care and education help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the need for abortions. The Democratic Party also strongly supports a woman's decision to have a child by ensuring access to and availability of programs for pre- and post-natal health care, parenting skills, income support, and caring adoption programs."

 

We can all be grateful to the Democratic Party for being upfront and unequivocal about the fact that it strongly supports unrestricted abortion — 24 / 7 / 365, at all times and all places and under all circumstances, with or without parental consent in the case of minors — together with the obligation of the American taxpayer to pay for same.  Abortion is, of course, the act of homicide directed against an unborn child.  Such forthrightness on the part of the Democratic Party is helpful to the public, because it removes ambiguity.  Please note that the phrase “family planning services” means, most of all, artificial contraception — which, not infrequently, includes de facto early-term abortions.  

Governor Sarah Palin - Fiercely Against Abortion

August 31, 2008 - St. Joseph Church Bulletin, Girardville, PA

Governor

SARAH HEATH PALIN

“fiercely against abortion”

 

 

 

I turned on the TV this afternoon (29 Aug).  Senator McCain had promised to announce his choice for vice-presidential running mate.It blew my mind when he announced that he had chosen Sarah Palin, the Governor of Alaska.  I had heard that she was “on the list” but I didn’t take it seriously.  I didn’t think John McCain would take the risk of putting such a strong pro-lifer on the ticket.

I have to confess to being delighted when I heard that he had chosen her.  She will help to make this an interesting election!

I laughed when I heard MSNBC commentator Andrea Mitchell say — with a somewhat pained expression on her face — that Governor Palin is “fiercely against abortion”.  (I am fairly certain that Andrea’s views on abortion are 180 degrees removed from Sarah’s!)

For the benefit of those who might not know:

Governor Palin is the most outstanding pro-life governor in the United States.


She is the mother of five children:  boy-girl-girl-girl-boy.  Noteworthy is that the eldest is 19, in the Army and scheduled to be deployed to Iraq.  Even more noteworthy is that the youngest (4 months old) has Down’s syndrome.  Sarah and her husband were well aware of this fact while the child was in utero.  They made it abundantly clear that they welcomed him with open hearts and open arms.

Commenting casually on the fact that her fifth child has Down’s Syndrome, here is a quote from the Governor when she was being interviewed a few days after giving birth to the little boy:

“I’m looking at him right now, and I see perfection. Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?”
 

DISCLAIMER
For the benefit of those who tend to get nervous about the intersection of politics with church bulletins, I beg to point out that neither of the two Girardville parishes, nor their pastor, takes any public position whatsoever on any candidate for public office nor do we support or oppose any political party — except I think it’s safe to say that we oppose the Communist Party.  And, oh yes, by the way, we also oppose the American Nazi Party.  I’m not sure if the ANP is still in business but, if they are, we definitely oppose them.  It’s okay to say that in a parish bulletin, isn’t it?  If it’s not okay, then I take it back.

 

 

Choice of Biden Re-Opens Catholic Wound

August 24, 2008 - St. Joseph Church Bulletin, Girardville, PA

Choice of Biden Re-Opens Catholic Wound

Own Bishop Outspoken on Obligation to Protect Life

CHICAGO, Aug 23, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The selection of Delaware Senator Joseph Biden as the vice presidential running mate of Barack Obama poses a major challenge for American Catholics, according to Fidelis, a national Catholic-based advocacy group.

Fidelis warned late last month that a pro-abortion Catholic choice as a vice presidential candidate would offend many Catholics who have struggled with the scandal of prominent pro-abortion Catholic politicians like Senator Biden.

Fidelis President Brian Burch commented, "Barack Obama has re-opened a wound among American Catholics by picking a pro-abortion Catholic politician. The American bishops have made clear that Catholic political leaders must defend the dignity of every human person, including the unborn. Sadly, Joe Biden's tenure in the United States Senate has been marked by steadfast support for legal abortion."

During the recent Democratic primary campaign Biden said: "I am a long-standing supporter of Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to choose."

In 2004, John Kerry's support for abortion sparked a nationwide controversy over whether Catholics who support legal abortion can receive Communion. The debate was re-activated in 2007 when several bishops criticized Rudy Guiliani, also a pro-abortion Catholic.

"Now everywhere Biden campaigns, we'll have this question of whether a pro-abortion Catholic can receive Communion. Senator Biden is an unrepentant supporter of abortion in direct opposition to the Church he claims as his own. Selecting a pro-abortion Catholic is a slap in the face to Catholic voters," said Burch.

Biden's own bishop, Bishop Michael Saltarelli of Wilmington, Del., has said that the issues pertaining to the sanctity of human life are the "great civil rights issues of this generation."

Bishop Saltarelli denounced the notion that politicians can 'personally oppose' abortion, but refuse to pass laws protecting the unborn.

"No one today would accept this statement from any public servant: 'I am personally opposed to human slavery and racism but will not impose my personal conviction in the legislative arena.' Likewise, none of us should accept this statement from any public servant: "I am personally opposed to abortion but will not impose my personal conviction in the legislative arena," said Bishop Saltarelli.

In fact, Bishop Saltarelli made clear that pro-abortion Catholic politicians should refrain from receiving the Eucharist.

"The promotion of abortion by any Catholic is a grave and serious matter. Objectively, according to the constant teaching of the Scriptures and the Church, it would be more spiritually beneficial for such a person to refrain from receiving the Body and Blood of Christ. I ask Catholics in this position to have the integrity to respect the Eucharist, Catholic teaching and the Catholic faithful."

Burch concluded: "The American bishops have instructed Catholic voters to consider many issues, but have characterized the defense of human life as 'foundational' and have explained that the issue has a special claim on the conscience of the Catholic voter. This means that a political candidate like Biden, because of his strong support for abortion rights, forfeits any claim for support despite his views on other issues like health care and the economy."

Note:  The pastor of St. Joseph Parish and St. Vincent dePaul Parish recognizes his civil obligation to refrain from using parish property or resources in order to support or to oppose any particular candidate or political party.  At the same time, he asserts his pastoral obligation and constitutional right to instruct his people about their moral obligations in the exercise of their right to vote and to inform them about the positions of political parties and candidates in the most crucial human life issues of our time:  (a) abortion; (b) stem cell research; (c) sanctity of marriage; (d) reproduction; (e) parental rights; (f) war; (g) death penalty.  Any seeming conflict between these two obligations will be resolved in as prudential a manner as possible.

Seventeen New Human Beings!

The word from Gloucester High School, Gloucester (MA) is that seventeen students are pregnant. Some people think this is unmitigated bad news. I don't think so. I think it is - dare I say it? - sort of kind of GOOD news! Now I won't go so far as to say that it is PERFECTLY MARVELOUS good news. It's mixed-bag news, but much more GOOD than BAD!

You have to admit that it's a whole lot better news than some news we've heard lately coming out of high schools! I mean the kind of news that tells us that some adolescent sociopath snuck an AK-47 into Problems of Democracy and bumped off a teacher, a vice-principal, fourteen of his peers and himself - all before Lunch.

Much rather would I like to hear news about high-school kids who are actively engaged in increasing the human population rather than decreasing it.
Don't jump to any hasty conclusions now!

I am not (repeat NOT) in favor of teenage fornication. In fact, I'm not in favor of adult fornication. In fact - and you can quote me on this - I'm totally against fornication by anybody at any time!  
My negative attitude towards fornication has everything to do with my Catholic faith. I'm against fornication because God is against it.

HOWEVER
- and we've dealt with this subject before in this bulletin, have we not? - fornication combined with artificial contraception is FAR more sinful than fornication plain and simple.  In fact, consensual intercourse engaged in by two unmarried teenagers who are not using any artificial contraception is not nearly as sinful as intercourse engaged in by a married couple who are using artificial contraception.
 
Before reading any further, please re-read that last paragraph. Recognize how utterly counter-cultural it is! Recognize also that it is indisputably true.
Recognize also that, if you do not know that it is true, then the fact is that (a) you have never learned the truth or else (b) having once learned the truth, like Demas, enamored of the world, you have departed from it.
Let's give those seventeen Gloucester Girls some credit. At least they know that the Creator, when He invented birds and bees, very definitely had reproduction in mind. After all, what do we call those parts of the anatomy? We call them "the reproductive organs", do we not?
 
So, let's do some high-fives for seventeen new human beings. May God bless, protect and preserve the babies! May they be healthy, wealthy and wise. May they be happy. May they all get baptized and learn about Jesus and get good marks in school and get good jobs and pay taxes so that I keep getting my Social Security check and may they be givers of love and receivers of love and have some good laughs and sing some funny songs and do some good deeds and discover a cure for cancer and a car engine that runs on water and go to Heaven to worship God and the Lamb.
 
By the way, Gloucester is a very Catholic town - and heavily Italian and Portuguese. Our world is blessed to have more Italians and Portuguese. They are wonderful people! And, Lord knows we need more Catholics!
 

This blog sponsored by Ave Maria Singles
BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.9.002. Contact Us